Home Blog Page 756

Focus on Madrid for the ‘most expensive game in the world’

0

Such is the history between the two great clubs of Real Madrid and Barcelona and the quality of the players on both sides that fans are willing to pay close to £2000 just to get into the stadium to watch them in action.

Their 21st November clash is just the latest installment of this great rivalry, as the likes of Cristiano Ronaldo and Leo Messi get ready to entertain the crowds, with a global television audience of hundreds of millions and with fans flying in from 38 countries around the world to attend the match.

According to Madrid based online ticket platform Ticketbis.net the least expensive tickets for the match on the open market are going for £237.41 whilst the highest price they have seen paid so far for the first ‘Clásico’ of the current Spanish league season is £1890.

Ahead of the game, Ander Michelena, CEO of Ticketbis, said, “We’ve seen massive interest in this match again, with fans buying tickets for Saturday’s game from all over the world including people from Japan, South Korea, Australia, North and South America and all over Europe. American and British fans love El Clasico and as well as being the biggest club match in the world it’s also the most expensive to attend.”

The average ticket resale price for the Madrid vs Barça is £616 as the 10 times European Champions host the current kings of Europe.

Barcelona and their ‘Culés’ head into the match at the top of La Liga by a three point match and are set to welcome Messi back into their ranks after a recent injury layoff. Madrid’s ‘Merengues’ will be hoping that their talisman Ronaldo will get the better of his Argentine rival at the Santiago Bernabéu stadium.

Real Madrid and Barcelona are of course the two best teams in Spain and they are also considered to be two of the best clubs in the world.

Real are said to be the richest football club in the world, bringing in hundreds of millions of pounds a year, whilst Barcelona also have a huge global following and both teams are hugely important to the Spanish economy.

Messi alone is said to earn nearly £50m a year himself, through his massive salary at Barcelona plus a string of lucrative sponsorship deals. Ronaldo, or CR7 as he is otherwise known, is a similarly unstoppable marketing machine.

In terms of international appeal fans from the UK are amongst those with the most hunger to get into the ground for the showdown, with 9% of resold tickets being snapped up by Brits, just behind the USA (9.1%) and just ahead of South Korea (7.9%) in terms of percentage of overseas tickets sales.

Ticketbis also calculate that of the 50 most expensive individual games in the top six European football leagues 20% of the matches have been previous clashes between Real Madrid and Barcelona.

Let battle commence!

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0 

Red Bull Racing looking to spend their way back to the top

0

The 2015 F1 season has been another disappointment for the formerly dominant Red Bull Racing team, with their drivers Daniil Kvyat and Daniel Ricciardo currently sitting seventh and eighth respectively in the standings, even if the team have still been splashing the cash over the last two years.

Red Bull Racing are currently trailing in the wake of the Mercedes, Ferrari and Williams teams and have been pushing for a more competitive package for 2016, so improvements should surely come before long considering their annual budget.

Indeed the team is said to be the first in F1 history to spend more than £200m in a single season, on the back of figures released in their latest accounts. Having won four consecutive championships from 2010 to 2013 they were beaten by Mercedes last year, finishing second despite their spending power.

The team have slipped further down the standings to fourth place in 2015, but have increased their budget to a record £203.6m in an attempt to return to winning ways. Red Bull Racing have dropped somewhat off the pace having had to remodel their car last year to accommodate the switch to environmentally-friendly 1.6-litre turbocharged V6 hybrid engines from the previous 2.4-litre V8s.

According to the Telegraph newspaper, last year the team spent £80.8m just on research and development, with a statement accompanying their accounts noting, “adapting to new technical regulations, in particular the adoption of a new power unit, were the most significant cost drivers.”

Staff salaries reached £62.9m, with the team’s number swelling by 19 members to 694 in total. The highest paid members of the team are of course the drivers, though the best rewarded director is team manager Christian Horner, who reportedly earns an annual salary of £2.6m.

Despite Red Bull’s slip from grace and even media talk of a split with Renault – as both parties strive for a more competitive race package – Horner has assured fans there is no chance of the drinks giant pulling out of F1. He commented, “Red Bull GmbH, confirmed to the directors that it has no plans or intentions that would materially affect the ordinary operations of the company within the next 12 months.”

Red Bull have the spending power to turn things around and speculation in recent months fuelled talk of a switch of manufacturer to Mercedes or Ferrari, from the French giant Renault. Their plans for 2016 are yet to be announced, but engine upgrades from Renault mean the partnership could continue next year.

Giving his opinion on Red Bull’s F1 spending and their quest for a return to full competitiveness, F1 commentator Ted Kravitz told foxsports.com.au recently, “This is about success leading to heightened expectations. After four years of winning the Constructors’ and Drivers’ Championships your expectations are that you’re going into every year, every championship, every race in a position to win it. And when the engine formula changes, the grim realisation that your engine partner hasn’t put enough time, money, manpower and brainpower into their supply to you — for which you are paying — makes you look at every avenue to resolve that situation.”

Which begs the next question, how much will Red Bull Racing’s team budget increase in 2016 and beyond?

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

London property value almost double that of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland combined

0

A report by one of the UK’s most popular mortgage lenders Halifax has highlighted the soaring value of property in London and the huge divide between the capital and the rest of the country in terms of stock worth.

The total value of housing in London is estimated at £1.13tn by Halifax, almost double the £582bn figure which the lender attributes to the combined value of homes in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Similarly the figure for London also dwarfs the housing stock in the north of England, from Cheshire to Northumberland, which the Guardian newspaper reports to be valued at £810bn.

The Halifax document detailed by the Guardian highlights that the estimated total worth of the United Kingdom’s private housing sector has risen over the £5tn mark, but the surge in value has been far greater in the south than the north.

Northern property value is said to have increased by 36% over the last decade with stock in the south rising by a massive 66% in the same period.

Overall the average property value in the UK is said to be around £205,000 and that figure alone is said to have risen 10% in just the last 12 months. Recent surveys by the UK’s Office for National Statistics have underlined just how much expectation Britons pin on their property investments with 44% of British citizens stating that they believe property will make them money, compared with less than 10% who place their faith in stocks and shares.

However, due to the sharp rise in prices first time buyers find it harder than ever to buy properties and owner-occupation in the UK has declined significantly since lenders made buy-to-let mortgages available. In 2005 70% of homes in the UK were said to be owner occupied, but that figure dipped below 65% this year.

Buying a house is a notoriously inaccessible step for many younger or less wealthy people in the South East of England but the rapid increase in property value means the phenomenon of being trapped in the renting cycle has also spread to other parts of the UK.

House prices have risen far more sharply than inflation and earnings, with housing up 53% on average throughout the UK over the past decade compared to a 35% rise in inflation. That means salaries and savings have not matched property market acceleration, so essentially buyers get less for their money.

For home owners of course, rising value and increased equity in their properties is only a good thing. Increases in combined figures for private equity in British property has far outstripped mortgage debt in recent years.

Martin Ellis, from the Halifax explains: “Aggregate net housing equity held by UK households is in a healthy state with total housing assets worth nearly £4 trillion more than the total value of mortgage debt. Despite the rapid rise in mortgage debt over the past ten year, net housing equity has grown by £1.4 trillion since 2005. The increase in total housing value over the past decade is equivalent to over £76,000 per privately owned property.”

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

Manchester City owners regenerating East Manchester as club revenue soars

0

The owners of Manchester City, the Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG), are continuing to revolutionise the club as it moves into profit, with off field investments boosting the local area and on field activities pointing to further success.

Since the 2008 takeover of the club, ADUG have faced criticism for their huge spending on first team players and were even pinned back by UEFA in an FFP ruling in 2014, only for the rules to be curtailed a year later.

Those criticisms often came from supporters of other clubs or those with a vested interest in maintaining a status quo which City and its owners have blasted out of the water. The club is now operating in profit for the first time since the takeover, the first team have won two league titles and two cups in four years and the future looks brighter than ever.

ADUG, led by the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates – Mansour bin Zayed bin Sultan bin Zayed bin Khalifa Al Nahyan, commonly known as Sheikh Mansour – have reportedly invested more than £1bn in the club over seven years.

With the investment largely managed by Chairman Khaldoon al-Mubarak the men from the Middle East have completely reshaped City on and off the field, with numerous world class players in the first team squad, plus the recruitment of talented individuals at every level behind the scenes.

Working alongside Khaldoon as the CEO of City is former Barcelona man Ferran Soriano, who has overseen massive commercial progress in East Manchester. Critics have pointed to sponsorship and investment from United Arab Emirates based companies such as Etihad, who sponsor the club’s stadium and new state of the art training facilities at the City Football Academy, but in truth City’s commercial success goes far beyond ADUG linked backing.

In October 2015 City reported record annual revenue of £351.8m and a seventh successive year of growth, moving into profit following “the retention and recruitment of a variety of regional and global commercial partners”.

Commercial revenue has increased massively as the club have started to win trophies again and become regular Champions League participants. Their latest set of financial figures show commercial revenue up 4% on 2013-14 to £173m, and broadcast revenue up 2% to £135.4m.

The club’s stadium has been expanded to 55,000 capacity, with plans in place for another increase to take it beyond 60,000 in the seasons ahead. Costs from the early post takeover years have been reduced, as have season ticket prices in some areas of the stadium, though some fans have complained about significant hikes in other areas.

City fans have little to complain about when it comes to the conduct of the Club’s owners. They have turned the former third tier side into winners and appear to be planning for years and years of future success.

ADUG have also expanded their football influence by creating New York City Football Club, Melbourne City Football Club and Manchester City Women’s FC.

When City’s recent positive financial figures were released, Khaldoon al-Mubarak, commented: “The financial model and the strategic investment is proven to work. Manchester City is now a profitable, self-sustainable club competing at the highest level in world football. The seeds of this year’s profit were sown some years ago and many people have contributed to making it happen. They deserve to be thanked and recognised. We also know that this is not the end, but the continuation of a process that should take us to an even brighter future.”

In addition to the improving stadium and the incredible Etihad Campus facility, described as the best training complex in world football, ADUG are continuing to nurture City’s relationship with the local community.

They have policies in place to ensure that a good percentage of people employed by the club come from the local area, whilst in 2014 ADUG and Manchester city council announced a 10-year agreement with the two parties forming a partnership entitled ‘Manchester Life.’

The deal will see 6,000 new homes built in run down parts of Manchester thanks to a further £1bn investment by City’s Middle East owners. The first phase will involve the construction of more than 800 new homes in Ancoats and New Islington, close to the Etihad Stadium and the Academy.

Construction will create hundreds of jobs for local people and will regenerate former industrial wasteland into a pleasant residential area.

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

‘Too big to fail’ banks under increasingly intense spotlight

0

Banking regulators are finalising new measures to deal with ‘too big to fail’ institutions as the finance sector continues to evolve and develop in the wake of the global economic crisis of 2008.

Chaired by Mark Carney, The Financial Stability Board (FSB) coordinates regulation across the Group of 20 economies (G20) and has its sights firmly set on the type of large banks which have been propped up by taxpayers in recent years.

Many hard working families have felt the brunt of the economic crisis, with welfare cuts and reductions of benefits in many developed nations, whilst large banks have been bailed out and supported by governments as they have sought to stabilise economies in uncertain times. Often senior bankers are perceived to have been rewarded for failure, whilst those on the margins of society have footed the bill.

Now Carney and the FSB are sharpening their tools as they look to mark a conclusion to the period of post-financial crisis ‘rule-changing’ which has damaged the image of the banking sector and weighed heavily on tax payers.

Ahead of a G20 summit next week, Carney stated in a letter to government leaders, “The financing capacity to the real economy is being rebuilt and significant retrenchment from international activity has been avoided. Countries must now put in place the legislative and regulatory frameworks for these tools to be used.”

In 2009 the FSB was asked by the G20 to introduce reforms to curtail bankers’ bonuses and increase bank capital requirements, whilst also shining a light on derivatives markets.

The Governor of the Bank of England, Carney has led the charge on behalf of the FSB to decrease the prolificacy of banks perceived to be “too big to fail”, which has been regarded as the last major post-crisis reform.

According to Reuters reporter Huw Jones, at next week’s G20 meeting in Turkey, leaders will be ‘asked to endorse a reform that requires the world’s 30 top banks to issue a buffer of bonds by 2019 that can be written down to raise funds equivalent to 18 percent of risk-weighted assets, if the lender goes bust. The buffer, known as total loss-absorbing capacity or TLAC, is in addition to the minimum core capital requirements a bank must already hold.’

The objective is to create a situation in which big banks which are not run well can fail without causing a financial meltdown in their national economy or in international markets. In other words, to avoid the kind of instability which occurred when the Lehman Brothers bank hit the rocks in 2008.

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

Asda to take a cautious approach to Black Friday 2015

0

The UK’s second biggest supermarket Asda is reportedly scaling back on its Black Friday discounts for 2015 after chaotic scenes last year. In 2014 bargain hungry shoppers were seen fighting as they battled to get their hands on heavily discounted items such as televisions, whilst the big discounts and extra staffing costs meant gains for the retailer were not as big as had been hoped.

Black Friday frenzy has gripped the UK in recent years as retailers have aimed to replicate the huge commercial success of the post Thanksgiving weekend in the US. Indeed it has become known as the biggest shopping day of the year due to the massive flash discounts offered on many high price items in the run up to Christmas.

Asda are owned by the US retail giant Walmart and have previously taken a full on approach to Black Friday but last year saw disappointing sales from the day of discounts, with little or no boost to their grocery sales produced by dropping prices on toys and electronics.

In a report published by trade journal Retail Week and picked up by the Guardian newspaper it is claimed that Asda will consider an online-only approach to discounting goods or will spread deals out over a period of several days in an attempt to avoid stampedes in stores.

Last year Asda is believed to have registered two million sales between 8am and mid-afternoon on Black Friday, giving them their busiest single trading day of the year to that point. However, a source quoted by the Guardian commented, “Last year big-ticket items sold at a loss and attempts to ensure safety by forcing shoppers to queue for items meant food sales tanked.”

This year many businesses are focusing their Black Friday strategy on online sales, yet this too requires careful planning and has the potential to backfire. In 2014 the online shops of a number of large retailers including Currys and Marks & Spencer struggled with demand.

Meanwhile in the run up to Black Friday retailers are unclear on what the day could bring, even if massive numbers of transactions are expected. Argos have issued a profit warning after investing heavily on advertising and logistics whilst being unsure of the level of sales activity to expect.

In addition John Lewis predict 2015 Black Friday sales will increase 20% on last year’s figures, but also believe that the heavy demand for special offers can later disrupt consumer spending and profitability in the run up to Christmas.

Figures from Experian-IMRG for 2014 showed that the total five-week period of Christmas shopping in the UK saw £4bn spent, with £810m of that on Black Friday, £720m on Cyber Monday and £702m on Boxing Day. For 2015 those figures are expected to rise to £1.07bn on Black Friday, £943m on Cyber Monday and £856m on Boxing Day, meaning a colossal overall spend of £4.9bn over the total five-week period.

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

TalkTalk begin to deal with fallout from latest security breach

0

Following the 21st October cyber attack on the UK’s telecoms company TalkTalk the firm’s management have been facing the press to allay fears of customers over potential future security problems.

The company’s chief executive Dido Harding believes the network’s cybersecurity is far more stringent than that of its competitors whilst reports have also emerged that the recent attack may have been less serious than previously reported.

Speaking to the Guardian newspaper in an in-depth interview, Harding commenting, “We are understandably the punchball for everybody wanting to make a point at the moment. Nobody is perfect. God knows, we’ve just demonstrated that our website security wasn’t perfect – I’m not going to pretend it is – but we take it incredibly seriously.”

“On that specific vulnerability, it’s much better than it was and we are head and shoulders better than some of our competitors and some of the media bodies that were throwing those particular stones.”

Unfortunately for Harding, TalkTalk have still been unable to calculate exactly how many of its database of four million customers had their privacy violated by last Wednesday’s attack, which saw clients’ personal data such as names, addresses and some bank account details taken. Harding stated that it is too early to say whether the company will offer customers compensation for having their data hacked, whilst the company insisted that the amount of information leaked was ‘materially lower than first feared’. The firm were held to ransom by the hackers before going public about the security breach but have not revealed whether they had paid up on the ransom demands.

Specialists from BAE Systems were reportedly called to step in and track down the cyber criminals, whilst staff from Scotland Yard’s cybercrime team are on the case. The company are also unable to guarantee that another attack would be prevented and this is not the first time TalkTalk’s networks have been hacked.

About the possibility of future attacks Harding told the Guardian, “It would be naive to say something like this will never happen again to any business. Digital safety is no different to physical safety. You can do your upmost to minimise it. You can arm yourself to protect yourself, but in the end there are criminals everywhere and that’s the way of the world. It’s usually tempting to say there will never ever be another attack but that would be naive.”

Industry analysts have openly criticised TalkTalk’s security systems in the past and say that the company’s reacted slowly and poorly to breaches, failing to encrypt and make data secure.

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

UK Government generates over £590 with sale of remaining Royal Mail share

0

The Government of the United Kingdom has authorised the sale of its last remaining share of the Royal Mail, generating £591.1 in the process.

The news was confirmed on Tuesday (13th October) as the Government sold off the remainder of its stake in the national network to institutional investors. The stake was 13% of the overall share of Royal Mail, whilst in a gesture of goodwill a remaining 1% stake was gifted to eligible Royal Mail staff in the UK.

The sale spells an end to the Government’s involvement in the operation of the

postal system which boasts 500 years of history. The privatisation process was really set in motion two years ago, sparking criticism from political opponents of David Cameron’s Tory coalition with the Liberal Democrats at that time.

Critics suggested that the Royal Mail had been sold of too cheaply, with trade unions supporting that argument.

But the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has continued the privatisation process, which culminated in Tuesday’s news of the final stake being sold off. In total the privatisation was generated proceeds of £3.3bn, with the delivery operator now fully controlled by private management for the first time in more than five centuries of operation.

Sajid Javid, Secretary of State for Business, stated, “This is a truly historic day for Royal Mail with the workers gaining a share of this history. We have delivered on our promise to sell the Government’s entire remaining stake which means that for the very first time the company is now wholly owned by its employees and private investors. This is the right step for the Royal Mail, its customers and the taxpayer. Proceeds will also go to help pay off the national debt – a crucial part of our long-term plan to provide economic security for working people.”

Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne added, “By fully leaving state ownership we have a win all round – for customers, the workforce and the taxpayer. And every penny will be used to pay down our national debt as we continue to bring our public finances under control. Once again, we are also going to recognise the hard work of the staff who have done a great job in turning the company around, and give them a 1% stake to share between them.”

A government statement also explained, ‘There is no policy need for government to hold shares in Royal Mail, as the universal postal service remains well protected by law and by Ofcom. Post Office Ltd, which operates the network of branches throughout the UK, remains wholly-owned by government and was separated from Royal Mail in April 2012.’

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

Macduff Shellfish to be acquired in £98.4m deal

0

Macduff Shellfish Group (“Macduff”), one of Europe’s leading wild caught shellfish processors, has entered into an agreement for 100% of the assets of Macduff to be acquired by Canadian-based Clearwater Seafoods (“Clearwater”) for £98.4m from the Beaton family and Change Capital Partners, the specialist pan-European private equity fund.

Based in Mintlaw, near Peterhead in Scotland, Macduff has factories in Mintlaw, Stornoway and Exeter and owns and operates 14 mid-shore scallop harvesting vessels from its Dumfries facility.  It employs approximately 400 people at the seasonal peak, specialising in scallops, langoustine, whelk and crab.

Nova Scotia-based Clearwater is one of North America’s largest vertically integrated seafood companies, employing approximately 1,400 people, delivering premium wild seafood including scallops, lobster, clams, coldwater shrimp, crab and groundfish.

The deal brings Macduff access to new markets, investment and opportunities for growth.  For Clearwater, the acquisition of Macduff provides access to market leading supply in key markets and channels along with a well-established brand, UK-based harvesting and processing expertise, a strong management team and a talented workforce.

Under the deal Macduff will retain its name and operate as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Clearwater, sharing resources and best practice between the businesses. Current Chairman Euan Beaton will become President of Macduff and Managing Director Roy Cunningham, will assume the role of Vice President.

Euan Beaton, Chairman of Macduff Shellfish, said: “Having reached our goal of building a £52m business, we had one suitor in mind which shares our vision and values to enable us to accelerate our growth on a global scale.  With a similar vertically integrated business model, sustainability at its heart, sound employee practices and strong relationships with fishermen but operating on a much bigger scale, Clearwater is an ideal fit for Macduff.

“This deal is great news for our operations in the UK, bringing investment and access to new markets within an extremely successful and respected business.  It provides learning and development opportunities for our staff as we share best practice with Clearwater and it gives fishermen access to more markets.”

Ian Smith, CEO of Clearwater said, “The acquisition of Macduff brings together two of the world’s leading and fastest growing vertically integrated wild shellfish harvesters. The transaction will allow Clearwater to integrate its vessel management and sustainable harvesting practices, innovative processing technologies along with its global sales, marketing and distribution footprint into Macduff; a company that already possesses a talented management team, excellent resource assets and a strong presence in Europe, the world’s largest and most valuable seafood market.  Our companies have been building a working relationship for more than three years and we are confident Macduff represents a highly attractive investment with a strong strategic fit for Clearwater.”

Steven Petrow, Partner at Change Capital Partners, said: “When we invested in Macduff in 2011 there was a compelling opportunity to transform the business through international expansion and strategic acquisitions. Thanks to our highly successful partnership with the Beaton family and Management we have delivered on all fronts and are incredibly proud of Macduff’s achievements.  This has been a very successful investment and we are convinced that the next chapter in the company’s history will be very exciting.”

Macduff was advised by Burness Paul, KPMG and Anderson Anderson & Brown.

Struggling retailer Tesco announces drop in profits

0

It may seem an exaggeration to describe British supermarket chain Tesco as ‘struggling’ as they announce underlying profits of £354m for the first half of the financial year, but considering that figure was £779m for the same period in 2014, the firm has seen a 55% decrease in profitability.

The pre-tax profit figure tells a healthier story at £74m, compared with a £19m loss for the same period in 2014. Meanwhile like-for-like sales have dropped 1.1% in the UK, but overall sales volume has risen 1.4% and the total number of transactions at Tesco in the first half of its financial year are also up 1.5%.

So what does all this really mean? The answer is somewhat complex, but the Tesco chief executive Dave Lewis who arrived from Unilever just over a year ago is rebuilding the company after they announced the worst results in their history in April. Those results showed a record pre-tax loss for the financial year to the end of February of £6.4bn.

Lewis has adopted a strategy of putting pressure on profits in the short term by introducing widespread price cuts and increasing the number of staff on the shop floor, to attempt to attract customers back.

Tesco have sold their South Korean Homeplus stores and reduced their overall debt by £4.2 billion in the process, but they have also confirmed that to meet the UK government’s potential National Living Wage of £9 an hour for workers by 2020 it will cost them about £500m.

Interviewed about the latest set of results by the BBC, Mr Lewis commented, “If I compare it to the second half of last year, the first half of this year feels like we’ve made some progress. We obviously had some issues to deal with, we dealt with them. It meant that in the second half of last year we made no profit whatsoever in the UK.”

“Our sales are growing compared to where they were either a year ago, or indeed in the second half of last year and we’ve generated some profit as we rebuild the profitability of Tesco business.”

Tesco’s announcement of poor results come shortly after competitor Sainsbury’s predicted rosier than anticipated full year profits.

The UK supermarket scene is an ultra competitive landscape. In relative terms sales are still dominated by the big four supermarkets Asda, Morrisons, Sainsbury’s, Tesco, who had a combined market share of 73.2% of the UK grocery sector in the quarter ending 4th January 2015.

That is a small decrease from 74.1% in 2007, but the ‘big four’ are coming under increasing pressure from discount retailers such as Aldi and Lidl.

Tesco plan to strike back with additional price cuts, after this week’s announcement of their underlying profits essentially dropping by more than half in the first six months of the financial year.

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 98,317.00 5.66%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 3,448.46 10.49%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 2.31 15.94%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 678.30 8.84%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 193.40 9.16%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 1.00 0.22%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.960324 23.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 3,442.18 10.03%
  • tronTRON (TRX) $ 0.251565 10.75%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 40.60 19.15%
  • the-open-networkToncoin (TON) $ 5.51 14.55%